The problem
Counterfeit-listing review is a high-stakes decision. Missing evidence must not become a confident accusation.
The approach
- Separate evidence collection and risk assessment from the human review decision.
- Document delivered scope and known limits rather than promise automatic counterfeit detection.
What the evidence shows
A public repository and sign-in-protected pilot explain the evidence-first workflow. Reported repository checks are evidence of the build process, not independently measured detection accuracy.
Known limits
Sign-in is required. No customer, reviewed-case count, accuracy metric, or unverified competition placement is claimed.