Skip to content
← All work

Case study / TradePulse Pro

Let the model extract. Let code do the money math.

Construction bid comparison with deterministic leveling arithmetic, source provenance, and clearly labeled sample-data scenarios.

Public source available. Live promotion awaits backend-target verification and any required sample-data migration.

ReactTypeScriptConvexFirecrawlAgentMail

The problem

Construction bids are difficult to compare when exclusions, lead times, and scope gaps are buried in different documents.

The approach

  1. Extract bid facts, then calculate adjustments deterministically rather than ask a model for a dollar penalty.
  2. Keep source provenance visible and distinguish a registry-verified record from an unverified web discovery.

What the evidence shows

The public repository documents the leveling formula, source provenance, and historical automated checks. The monetary comparisons in its example are sample-data scenarios, not customer savings.

Known limits

Demo-company naming and draft-addendum wording require hygiene work before the live demo is featured. No customer usage, competition placement, legal validity, or independently repeated test count is claimed.

Inspect the evidence

Have a related problem?

Request a scoped quote ↗